Super International Cricket

I am an American. I was born in America. I have never been to Great Britain or its former colonial holdings (well…unless you count America). I can probably count the number of British people I’ve met on one hand…if I was missing a couple of fingers. That being said, you would think I have no business reviewing a cricket game, or even thinking of playing one. You’d be wrong. I actually not only understand cricket, but I also rather enjoy watching it (when matches don’t start 10 time zones ahead of me). Now, most Americans, when they think of cricket, probably have a vague idea of that weird game English people play with flat bats and sweaters.

In a lot of ways, it’s the spiritual predecessor to baseball, and if you take the time to learn the rules and get an idea of what’s going on, you’ll find a game that can be a strategic battle, with bowlers trying to outwit batsmen, batsmen trying to pick out the holes in the field, and the occasional feat of athletic excellence, and since we here at JGR are all about breaking down cultural barriers, maybe after reading this, you’ll not only discover a new game, you’ll also discover…a new game. Also, I wrestled for a while with how to actually write this, given how foreign cricket is to a large chunk of our readers, and in the end, I decided to write this assuming anyone reading it actually has an understanding of the rules and terminology of cricket. If you hate it, I apologize.

Super International Cricket seems like a doomed prospect from the start. There’s no national licenses, no actual players, no licensed tournaments, and not even actual cricket grounds. It’s very much cricket in a vacuum. On the upside, though, none of the rosters can every actually be outdated, so there’s that.

True to form, New Zealand is getting their collapse in early.
True to form, New Zealand is getting their collapse in early.

You have the option from the title screen of choosing a fast match, which picks teams at random and just dumps you in, one-day matches, with the option for both 20/20 (which I do not care for in reality), and proper 50-over matches, Test matches (as are right and proper), and World Series (not the Kerry Packer one, it’s just tournament mode). You then select from one of 8 of the Test playing nations (sorry, Zimbabwe, it appears you’re locked out of Test cricket here, too). You can fiddle around with your squad, although the computer picks the best eleven automatically, and even stranger, you don’t get to see the field conditions until AFTER you select a squad, so adding an extra spinner or seamer to the side is literally a gamble.

Batting is obviously the high point of this game, as it is in pretty much all cricket games, but sadly, that’s still not saying a lot. Yes, you can still see the spot the ball’s going to pitch, and while it does take a bit of the suspense out of it, you don’t know where it will move after that (I’d also argue that this might have to be done in cricket games given that you’re not constrained to bowling in a strike zone like baseball). Y plays a shot to the left side of the screen, A plays to the right, B attempts a straight drive, and X is your defense, and you can move about the wicket pretty freely. Holding the shoulder buttons will make you attempt a slog, but it always seems like your batsman has no concept of playing shots along the ground anyway.

Maybe I’m just terrible at this game, but I think I holed out to cover point WAY too damn many times for it just to be an issue with bad timing. Assuming you can actually manage to put the ball in play, holding down on the control pad will go for a run, and up will make them go for a second. This brings up the one thing that this game actually got right that damn near no other cricket game seems to realize: BATSMEN DO NOT ALL RUN AT THE SAME SPEED. Some are slower than others, and you have to take that into consideration when attempting a second run…well, to an extent. Batsmen can also dive considerably long distances, so that kinda tilts things a bit. Once you get the timing down, you can begin to piece together some respectable scores, but I dare say that 50s and 100s are pretty much non-existent here, and you’ll be lucky to scratch 40 before the game decides that it’s time for you to gently pop one up to mid-on.

You'll be chasing that tiny blip around a lot.
You’ll be chasing that tiny blip around a lot.

I’m also happy to report that bowling is not the worst aspect of this game. It’s not good, but it’s really no worse than most other cricket games. You plant the cursor, press a button to start your run-up, and press it again to stop it, which is more of a pain in the ass than necessary. You’ll no-ball quite a bit, and you’ll start deliveries a few yards short of the line more than a few times trying to find the right spot. Y and A also dictate seam movement, as well as spin, but it doesn’t seem to make a whole hell of a lot of difference, quite frankly; if you’re getting smacked around, you’ll get smacked around regardless. I know what you’re thinking. The bowling sounds pretty dreadful, how is it not the worst part of the game?

Because there’s FIELDING. Fielding is what’s going to drive you away from this game. Your keeper and slip fielders tend to be pretty good. They don’t tend to botch catches or let balls get through them for cheap fours, but they’re the exception. You have to manually control fielders, and when a ball is put far enough into play, the camera pulls back to a distance that makes the ball look microscopic. So, you have to basically pixel hunt to find the ball, and even with a cursor that shows where the ball will land, it’s still an unplanned challenge because your fielders apparently have ten thumbs and won’t catch shit. You’ll frequently have to dive at balls that have stopped because that’s the best way to actually get the game to register your fielding being where the ball is so he can pick it up. Once you’ve tracked the ball down, X tosses it to the keeper, B to the bowler’s end, and A knocks the bails off. Also, Y is utilized while fielding to appeal. It only really comes into play to appeal for an LBW decision, but that doesn’t stop you from making your whole team shout “Howzat!” to either entertain yourself or aggravate the umpire.

I tried to play a leg glance. This happened. I'm...not good at this.
I tried to play a leg glance. This happened. I’m…not good at this.

Visually, it’s pretty meh. everything seems to be awash in pastels, animations are a bit clunky, and even the little picture-in-picture features that pop up for boundaries or dismissals looks like they’re missing a few frames. It’s not a good sign when the best looking thing in the entire game is the duck that walks by when you’re out for naught. Sound is slightly better; there’s a little light tune that plays during matches, but it’s barely audible unless everything else is silent, which it will be quite a bit. I understand cricket crowds tend to be a bit more subdued than soccer crowds, but the fans here are dead silent unless someone hit a boundary or got dismissed. The bat-on-ball and ball-on-wicket sounds are passable, given the era, but you’re not going to close your eyes and imagine yourself at Lord’s or Old Trafford playing this game.

Cricket video games rather a rare breed. The general consensus is that good cricket games tend to be even harder to find. That doesn’t mean they can’t be enjoyable, but it does mean you’ll have a hard time finding a cricket game that actually resembles what you see on TV (especially Test matches). The Brian Lara/Shane Warne series on Genesis was decidedly better than this, in my opinion, but seeing as this was the only cricket game out there for Super Nintendo, I imagine Super International Cricket got its share of play…until there was actual cricket on TV and someone decided to watch it instead.


The Good

Um…being the only cricket game on Super Nintendo helped a LOT. Also not terribly complex to figure out.

The Bad

No real players, grounds, or tournaments, batting is basically a random number generator, and your fielders are all cockfingered twats that should be dropped in favor of the Black Knight from Monty Python.


Our Score
Click to rate this game!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

4 thoughts on “Super International Cricket

  1. You’ve got to know what a crumpet is to play cricket!

    This is a nice surprise. I haven’t played much of the game on the SNES, but it was re-hashed and released on the PC as EA Cricket ’96, which added very little apart from some truly dreadful video clips featuring Australian commentators. It was then re-released as Ian Botham’s International Cricket ’96 (I think in the UK only) which added a further layer of awfulness as ‘Beefy’ starred in clips of his own, during which he pretended to know, and work with, the commentators from the earlier release.

    Anyway, based on my experiences with the PC version, I agree with most of what you say here. Batting is certainly a bit of a lottery, and no matter how carefully you play, eventually your batsman will unleash that ham-fisted off-side shot and loop an easy catch to a fielder. I do think the bowling animations deserve some praise, though, particularly for fast and medium paced bowlers, they’re still some of the most convincing around, and certainly better than the ‘mannequin pushed down a hill’ approach of Brian Lara/Graham Gooch/Allan Border/Jonty Rhodes (delete as appropriate) Cricket.

    I’d probably rate this (or the version I’ve played anyway) above those games – they’re both deeply flawed, but in different ways. At least this one’s whack-bash approach makes cricket seem vaguely entertaining, albeit a bit ridiculous, while the slow pace of the Gooch/Lara games tricks you into thinking there’s a deeper, more considered game underneath, when (in my opinion anyway) there actually isn’t.

    Anyway, thanks for the review! Although I’m slightly disappointed you didn’t include a screenshot of a batsman getting hit on the head.

    1. I wish someone would explain to me why it’s so damn hard to make a good cricket game. The best one I’ve played (again, opinion) was Brian Lara 07. I haven’t tried Ashes International or any of the ones after it, but I don’t have much faith those are worth trying to track down.

      Also, I have a sneaking fear that me posting this review put the hex on England.

      1. Ugh, don’t mention the real cricket…

        I think it probably is quite hard to make a good cricket game because it’s a tricky sport to simulate. Also I doubt the incentive is there because cricket fans buy the bad ones anyway. There’s enough of a market to justify a half-hearted effort every couple of years or so, but not enough for a couple of competing franchises to be released annually and both do well.

        My impression is that things need to be made a little more instinctive. Bowling should be require more effort to successfully execute a delivery and get it in the right place, while batting should be more about quick reaction and shot selection. Sure, you could still be shown where the ball’s about to land, but maybe just at the point of delivery rather than as the bowler runs up. For bowling, maybe something a little more like the serve in tennis games, giving you a short window to sort out power and direction rather than being able to plonk the ball wherever you like?

        My own favourite is Lara 2005 although I need to spend a little more time with 2007. Ashes Cricket 2009 isn’t worth tracking down. There are a couple more on the horizon – Ashes Cricket 2013 (which has had a troubled development and was supposed to come out in the summer) and Don Bradman 2014 (which looks fairly promising although I’m not getting my hopes up).

  2. “I am an American. I was born in America. I have never been to Great Britain or its former colonial holdings (well…unless you count America).”

    Dammit, now you’ve got me snorting loudly in my office. People will realize I’m not actually working in here!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.